Sustainability in Logistics Index
  • Home
  • About
  • Student teams

Report_Team#1. Part 2.

  • By Taisiya Sikorskaya
  • Oct-30-2009
  • Project monitoring, Sustainability, team1-CSU
  • 1 Comment.
  1. I. Factors influencing sustainability

As sustainability was defined like a state of the social and natural systems, it has its own factors and indicators. You can see the scheme of factors division in the frames of the company.

БезымянныйPic.2. Groups of sustainability factors on the firm level (transport is in the empty square)

We like the deduction method and we decided to apply it in indicating factors as well. Thus we developed common sustainability factors and particularly sustainability factors in logistics.

A)   As our research area is defined, we resolved not to go into common factors division and just to define two groups: internal and external factors.

So the distinguised external factors are:

1) legal system including taxes,

2) government investments,

3) target market,

4) private investments,

5) HR,

6) the size of the company,

7) infrastructure of the company,

8) used techs,

9) general management,

10) procurement,

11) type of the product,

12) the market competition and whole state,

13) the X factor.

The internal factors:

1) labour organization,

2) production volumes,

3) transportation,

4) communicational system,

5) capacity,

6) the X factor.

Of course, all these factors can be grouped according to their sphere of activity or initiative. And so the internal factors can be further subdivided.

B)   To describe sustainability in logistics factors we’d like to present you the framework of company’s parts interaction with society, government and biosphere. It’s illustrated below.

Рисунок1

Рисунок2

Pic.3. Company interaction with customers, government and procurement.

where B stands for biosphere, C – for a company with P (production) and S (storage), G – government, Proc – procurement, TM – target market. So you can notice here different financial, informational and material flows, that are studied by logistics; white arrow symbolizes an impact on the planet made by the enterprise. Logistics is presented on the scheme as a correlation and cooperation of all the flows and their conditions (as, for instance, the position of S).

All processes are cyclical, so there’s no beginning and no end. The system is very fragile, that’s why sustainability in logistics is considered to be essential as it keeps all the parts (including Biosphere) in required balance.

Factors, as it seems to us, are represented by the influence or the activity of all structures in this picture.

In the end, we’ve got the following hierarchy of factors (AFSD – atmosphere friendly for sustainable development):

Table 1. Sustainability indicators, their description and scales of estimation

 

Group Factor Unit measure Description Scale
Common (Z) Productivity (Z1) Percentage of alteration (comparing with the previous period) of the amount of production per one employee including science linkage of the product. High productivity level proves the rational resource usage. Percentage: ball from 0 to 1.
  Profitability (Z2) Percentage of alteration (comparing with the previous period). Profit divided key assets; shows the return on the funds. Percentage: ball from 0 to 1.
  Number of “guaranteed” suppliers (Z3) Percentage Part of suppliers which is represented by   “guaranteed ones” (means supplier working in frames of sustainable development plan). Percentage: from 0 to 1.

Estimation: # guaranteed suppliers/ # all suppliers

  X-factor (Z4) Changing subjective factor (stays variable in function, except cases described). Tendency to increasing of the number of such cases is the evidence of company mistakes 1 – if there was accident gone beyond normal practice (e.g. fatal one); 0 – everything was OK.
Government (X) ROI (X1) Yes/no Investments help an enterprise to follow the sustainable development plan. Yes – 1, 0 – no.
  Taxes (X2) Tax rates (constant indicator) Shows the extent of government interest and thus AFSD. Expert group should research the law system.
  Legal system (X3) Adequacy (constant indicator) Can be counted for every country in particular, shows AFSD. Expert group should research the law system.
Society and target market (Y) ROI (Y3) Percentage Shows the amount of money the enterprise needed to get one money unit of profit. This indicator is necessary as profitable company has more chances to become sustainable, we think. ROI = net income / owned capital + fixed liabilities )*100%;The score is from 0 to 1.
  Market attitude (Y2) Percentage Part of people who are ready to pay more to get more “sustainably produced” product . Percentage (0-1) is taken from market research, done by expert group (e.g. RU:
  Market competition and state of market (Y1) Percentage  of sustainably developing companies (in the industry) Shows both the attitude of the market to sustainability and competition in the frames of it Percentage: ball from 0 to 1.
Logistics (W)        
Production (W1) The presence of idle time Yes/no Proves the wrong choice of working plan Yes – 0; no – 1.
Storage (W2) The convenience  of warehouses disposition (W23) Balls (depending on the distance) The speed of navigation between objects Subjective: the score is from 0 to 1.
  The collaboration with other companies (W24) Yes/no Sharing warehouses with others brings additional profit and eliminates an additional impact on the environment Yes – 1; no – 0.
  Reducing of annual energy consumption per unit (W21) kW per unit alteration – percentage The rationality of energy consumption and the progress in producing tech Score is from 0 to 1.
  Warehouses filling (W22) Percentage The more fulfilled warehouse the better space using. From 0 to 1.
  Automation of storing systems (W25) Percentage It’s the part of space which is automated. From 0 to 1.
  Automation of loading/unloading (W26) Percentage The part of work done by machines. Percentage: >80% – 1, <20% – 0. Everything between these numbers is subjectively estimated.
Transport (W3) Optimization of navigation routs (W31) Km or litres Shows the speed of route passing.  
  Filling of transportation units (TU) (W32) Percentage The rational using of space in TU Fulfilled – 1, less filling less score.
  The collaboration with other companies (W33) Yes/no The sharing transportation units with other companies (sometimes half-route) affords to save fuel, time, etc. Yes – 1, no – 0. Middle opportunities are closely studied.
  Number of trips (W34) Product volumes divided one transportation unit load limit Number of transportation trips. Subjective factor, depends on the expert team; the score is from 0 to 1.
  Automation of unloading systems (W35) Percentage The part of products unloaded with help of machines. >80% – 1, <20% – 0. Middle opportunities are closely studied.
  CO2 and other pollutants emission (W36) Percentage: reducing in connection with production expansion. Shows waste volumes of the company changes. Estimation: CO2%/ expansion% (calculated in comparison with the previous year). This indicator: >1 – 0 scores;  =1 – 0,5 scores; <1 – 1 score.
  Average fuel consumption of vehicle fleet (W37) L per 100 km in comparison with the standard (including season, age, region factors) It’s better to increase this number.  Higher %  – better fuel usage and route planning. Percentage: from 0 to 1.
  New roads, pipes, routs per year (W38) Yes/no Shows the extension of nature usage. Yes – 0, no – 1.
Communication (W4) Informatization level Percentage Percentage of company departments using new tech in communication From 0 to 1.

That’s for the factors. We have identified the correlation between factors and groups of them with the help of SAATI – Analytical Hierarchy Procedure.

Comments

← Previous Post Next Post →

eBook Learn Russian to work with Russians

Learn Russian to work with Russians: The Easy Way To Speak Russian Hardcover, paperback and eBook

ABOUT

Blog for discussing sustainability issues in Logistics and developing Sustainability in Logistics Index/ Duurzaamheidsindex in Logistiek.

QUOTE OF THE WEEK

Alex Fradkin: “I believe that ecology is a very fragile thing, which we have to protect as only we can.”

Categories

  • Discussions
  • Documents
  • Project monitoring
    • team1-CSU
    • team2-CSU
    • team2-HAN
    • team3-CSU
    • team3-HAN
  • Questions
  • Suggest idea
  • Sustainability
  • Uncategorized

Authors


admin

Taisiya
Sikorskaya

Jan
Jansen

Juliya
Mehontseva

Rui
Zhang

Yan
Gao

Olga
Lyamina

Karamfil
Todorov

Olga
Pikuleva

Anastasiya
Mikryukova

alexey_1

Sergey
Piskunov
Recent Posts
  • The International Sustainable Logistics Conference
  • SIL Index project certificates
  • Read about us
  • Project closing
  • Final grades
Recent Comments
  • Taisiya Sikorskaya on Project closing
  • Jan H. Jansen on Practical part of the project
  • Jan H. Jansen on Practical stage report. Team#1
  • Jan H. Jansen on About the practical stage…
  • Elena Kaledinova on Practical part of the project
Archives
  • June 2010
  • March 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
Tags
Analysis Articles Books company introduction Conference Meeting Soft Contact us COSCO definition sustainability DOSIT environment factors frameworks Jan Jansen project goal Questionnaire Results of SIL index RSS feeds schemes shipping carrier SIL index Sugesstions for blog supply chain supply chain flows Sustainability value chain
Links
  • Learn Russian

parksandlandscapes.org Blog

  • Nederland: Heide landschap, Posbank, Gelderland
  • Nederland: 's Avonds in het park, Veluwezoom, Gelderland
  • Netherlands: The stonecrop flower, Veluwezoom, Gelderland
  • Nederland: Het Landkaartje, Veluwezoom, Gelderland
  • Nederland: Mooie druiven op de Veluwezoom, Gelderland

business-opportunity-russia.com

  • Sustainable road freight transportation
  • Generative AI
  • Supply chain finance in a digital and sustainable environment
  • Using cloud technology for international supply chains
  • Impact of artificial intelligence on transportation sustainability

Business Initiatives Group

  • How AI influences sustainability in transportation
  • The case study on cloud technology
  • Teaching basic business Russian
  • International trade with South Korea (part B)
  • Google News – Business tools and skills

Log in

Kaledinova Web Design

  • twitter
  • rss
  • pinterest

 |  © Copyright | Sustainability in Logistics Index